It’s the copout line for dumping someone.
There’s a reason—maybe a list of reasons—to reject the guy, but honesty can
hurt or prolong things with denial and an argument. The easy way out is to say,
It’s me.
I’m at a bad
place in my
life right now.
life right now.
I’m not a good
enough person.
I’ve got to
spend all my spare time
cleaning the closet in the den.
(Something may
have died there.)
In my last blog post, I turned down a guy after
a second date that was no better than the first. Initially, I’d found his
opinions too harsh. In his profile and on both dates, he’d acknowledged this as
a common perception but dismissed the criticism with a Fuck that. Everyone is too intent on being politically correct.
Maybe, maybe not. All I know is political correctness keeps my blood pressure
on an even keel.
My gut had been to decline the second date.
I’d had enough…heard enough. But occasionally—and, indeed, after the last
post—a blog reader has the guts to raise an uncomfortable I Wonder.
I
wonder if you’re being too picky.
Oh, how I brace at the comment. (It’s
probably why only readers posit this while face-to-face friends and
acquaintances keep mum.)
I’m not too picky. I’m not too picky. I’m
not too picky.
As if repeating it makes it true. A three-year-old’s
approach.
And then I hear Harry’s voice. Harry, aka
Billy Crystal, talking to Sally, aka Meg Ryan in my favorite move, giftedly
penned by the late great Nora Ephron:
HARRY: There are two kinds of
women: high
maintenance
and
low maintenance.
SALLY: And Ingrid Bergman [in
Casablanca] is low
maintenance?
HARRY: …Definitely.
SALLY: Which am I?
HARRY: You’re the worst kind.
You’re high maintenance,
You’re high maintenance,
but
you think you’re low maintenance.
I would contend that I’m a low maintenance
date. I have no list. All I ask is that a guy show up on time, dress in
something slightly more fashion-forward than a favorite sports team jersey, put
away his phone and engage in a genuine back-and-forth conversation. Okay,
there’s a physical attraction piece, too, but that’s mostly out of our control.
I’d say I’ve been passed over on looks just as many times as I’ve passed. Few
of us are objectively, universally hot and by “us” I definitely, conclusively do
not include myself.
It’s the conversation piece where things
froth or fizzle. And based on all I’ve sat through, eighty percent of fizzled
chats come from too much talking, not enough listening. A first date may feel
like an interview but it’s not. You’re not trying to cram everything great
about you—every trip, every detail of your last dinner party and every
itty-bitty dimension of your job—into a roughly forty-minute sit-down.
Don’t forget there’s another guy who showed
up, hoping to share an anecdote or a factoid about himself. If you don’t have
Barbara Walters’ interviewing skills—for the record, I’d be an arbutus
tree—then pause every two or three minutes and simply say, “And what about
you?” Order a scone with your coffee so you have to stop and chew once in a
while. (You don’t talk with your mouthful, do you? Maybe that’s another of my
conditions.)
I should wrap up this post.
If I keep writing, I fear that more
conditions will surface.
Too
picky.
Am I more Sally than Ilsa? Does my blog
leave a trail of damning evidence concerning my unrealistic expectations? Am I
too quick to dismiss?
SALLY: I don’t see that.
What if there are grounds for a class-action
lawsuit against me, brought by the masses of single gay men in Vancouver who
have been disparaged and dismissed in this blog without any counterpoint? Am I
guilty of a pattern and practice of dating defamation?
Too picky? Me?! I have no reason to be, no
right to be. But then I hear a certain movie character again.
SALLY: Well, I just want it the way I want it.
And, as much as I could pick that apart, it sounds about right.
No comments:
Post a Comment