Monday, December 22, 2025

FEELING THE "HEAT"


I’m three episodes into Crave TV’s Heated Rivalry (now airing as well on HBO) and, yes, there are moments I needed to slide open the balcony door to cool things off. The hockey romance series is aptly described by The Advocate as a “very horny gay TV show.” In just the first episode, there was plenty of footage of shirtless jocks as well as lots of butt shots and simulated gay sex. Such scenes continue in the next two episodes though perhaps with slightly less frequency. (Or maybe the surprise of the flash factor was no longer so great.)

 


Based on the Game Changers hockey romance book series by Canadian Rachel Reid, it's nice to have a story to go along with all that skin and sex. Admittedly, the storylines are on the stale side. Hockey remains a closeted sport—like virtually every team sport—so plotlines focus on men in the closet, hoping not to be caught with another guy and, in one case, struggling with the possibility of coming out. Gayness is still taboo. It wasn’t long ago that the National Hockey League walked back its participation in team Pride Nights by no longer wearing special jerseys with rainbow stripes. This was on account of the fact that a few players refused to wear the jerseys and NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman’s conclusion that the wearing of jerseys became “a distraction.”

 

So, yes, Heated Rivalry begins with closeted characters. It feels so 1990s. 

 


Men used to joke that they read Playboy for the articles. It’s not a joke, however, that I’m continuing to watch this series for the hockey. As a kid growing up in Canada, I played a couple of seasons of hockey. I skated well but I sucked at everything else—body checking, stick handling, shooting the puck. I’ve watched hockey during the Olympics. About fifteen years ago, I avidly watched a few seasons of Vancouver Canucks hockey, in part, because I lived on the relatively remote Sunshine Coast of British Columbia and, frankly, there was little else to do. (I stopped watching because of the prominence of fighting in the sport which I’d say, if I had a conversation with Gary Bettman, is the true “distraction” in the game.)

 

Because of my background, hockey is a more interesting milieu for me than, say, the military setting for the Netflix series BootsRookie all-stars Shane Hollander and Ilya Rozanov are personal rivals playing on rival teams, the Montreal Metros and the Boston Raiders. I like that these teams are referred to as among the original six in a fictitious league, just as the Montreal Canadiens and the Boston Bruins are part of the original six in the NHL. I love all the talk about goal scoring, slumps and player superstitions. I love that the comments in the press room are actually more interesting than the banal, clichéd responses real NHL players give in post-game or between-period interviews. Yes, while others may be freaking out about the hot gay sex, I’m geeking out over an authentic portrayal of the professional sport.

 

It's only a six-part season so I’m bound to finish watching Heated Rivalry. Even though the storylines feel passé in dealing with coming out, it’s significant that the series has been renewed for a second season, something that did not happen for Boots and was not followed through upon by Showtime when it initially sought to pick up the Neil Patrick Harris series Uncoupled. Mainstream streaming channels have not been particularly warm  to continuing to breathe life into gay shows. Let the steam and the story of Heated Rivalryplay on.

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, December 16, 2025

BODY TALK 2025


I’ve noticed a number of articles popping up, weighing in on the body sizes of the stars of Wicked: For Good. According to a CNN article, “’Wicked: For Good’ revives an uncomfortable debate about bodies and images,” it’s been considered taboo over the past decade to comment on or critique celebrities’ bodies which, frankly, is news to me. In our Insta world, stars often post thirst trap photos of their bodies, the intention being to get “likes” and build a following. To me, a “like” is itself a comment on someone’s body or how they generally look in a pic. For better or for worse, celebrities who are frequently in the public eye are often subject to scrutiny about what they wear and how they look.

 

In the case of Wicked, the concern is people are commenting that its stars look too thin and the counter-response is that a person’s thinness is none of their business. This is not new. As someone diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, I have been acutely aware of when a fashion model or a D-list celebrity is considered too thin. I struggle with this notion that people should not comment on what is perceived to be extreme thinness. I would agree that some bodies are just naturally thin. But usually the comments arise when the person’s body has gone through some sort of transformation, from larger to thinner or from thin to even thinner. 

 

I don’t read the comments but I’m sure there are many that are needlessly—and intentionally—harsh. Still, I feel certain that, when it comes to thinness, many comments are expressed out of concern. I don’t feel a strong sense that these comments should be discouraged. Speaking up when concerned—even if the concern is ultimately misplaced—may be better than saying nothing at all. 

 


Too often weight loss generates all sorts of compliments which may, in turn, encourage the person to work at shedding more pounds. Positive feedback fosters further “positive” action. But I think it’s fair for someone in earnest to vocalize a sense of caution at some point. “Hey. Are you okay? Are you checking in with a professional about your weight loss?”

 

“Invasive!” many will scream. “That’s crossing a line.” Yes. Likely. It’s tricky with people we know on a personal level while so much easier on social media. The personal level is, of course, where an expression of concern can have more of an effect… both positive and negative.

 


For myself, the eating disorder part of me loves when I start losing more weight. Looking in the mirror, I see pesky body parts become trimmer, maybe even acceptable. I carry a suspicion that, hmm, maybe my face is getting too thin but I tell myself it’s worth it to have a six-pack and tamed love handles. Weight never comes off evenly throughout the body. So often, it seems the body part I’m most bothered by is the last to show any change from heightened food restriction and increased exercise. 

 

Once, in college, a group of friends had an intervention with me. I had stumbled on a way of eating that resulted in pounds dropping off with ease to the point where I was fifty pounds lighter than I am today. I was gleeful. This was a game and I was winning. 

 

It was during the ’80s when baggy clothes were in fashion so I figured no one could see my body changes. It was all for me, not anybody else. I suppose, however, my fashionably baggy clothes reached a point of becoming unfashionably baggy. “You’ve gotten too thin,” they said. “Your face is gaunt.” The way they said it sounded harsh. They were viewing my face negatively. It was a problem.

 


It was also a jolt. To myself, everything was great. How could weight loss not be a positive thing? Society celebrated dieting success. And I was succeeding exceptionally. I did not see a doctor. I did not receive an eating disorder diagnosis. That wouldn’t come for another thirty-six years. But their talk scared me—enough for me to abandon my weight loss routine and gradually gain back some weight. 

 

Commenting made a difference.

 

I know that others will double down and assert that the commenter is out of line. The reaction will be some form of How dare you?! If there truly is an eating disorder at play—diagnosed or undiagnosed—that part of the person will fight. It will dismiss and deny. The incident may even cost a friendship. Hopefully, it doesn’t come to that. But difficult conversations are just that. Sometimes it’s better to have them no matter what the stakes are.

 

I often think of Karen Carpenter who died from an eating disorder in 1983 at the age of 32. Any Google Image search of her shows a person who is objectively on the thin side. In some photos, she looks hauntingly thin. Did people close to her wait too long to speak up? Did they not speak up at all? To this day, her death is the most tragic celebrity death I can think of. 

 

Once again, when I was thirty, some other friends called me on my weight loss. At the time, I was struggling financially and I brushed off their concerns until one of them showed up at my door with a loaf of bread from a bakery. I was deeply embarrassed. I could buy my own basic foods. Was I that thin? 

 

One friend talked to me about seeing a doctor. I’d recently moved back to Canada and didn’t have a medical practitioner. Back in the days of Yellow Pages, I didn’t have a clue how to go about picking a doctor. My friend gave me a couple of recommendations. All this concern jolted me again. I went to a doctor. Through tears, I asked him if I had an eating disorder. (Did men even get eating disorders?) He went with the empathy card instead of playing the curiosity card. He quickly said, “You don’t have an eating disorder. You’re just extremely fit.” In my gut, this didn’t sit right. It offered no relief. Normally, I’d have been giddy from the “extremely fit” remark. I knew deep down I had a problem. I knew my routines were exhausting me. I needed a professional to tell me to stop. Whether I stopped or not was another matter, but it would have helped to have even the possibility of an eating disorder acknowledged. That still wouldn’t come for another twenty-three years.[1]

 

All this is to say that I don’t think commenting on social media about a celebrity losing perhaps too much weight is going to make a difference, even when well-intentioned. Many celebs are extremely image-conscious. Their profession makes this so. It is possible that a strong wave of remarks about possibly being “too thin” might make them consider talking to a doctor, a psychiatrist or a dietitian. I suspect the public comments might instead provide an impetus for friends, family or even an agent to have a frank, caring conversation. “Well…now that it’s out there…” Again, getting a professional opinion to make sure they haven’t gone too far can be a good thing, assuming the professional proves to be more knowledgeable and curious than mine was all those years ago.

 

Eating disorders thrive on secrecy. Mine certainly does. When it is finally “out there” with others noticing and wondering, there is at least the possibility for consultation and, with professional support, slow change. Honestly, when it comes to conversation about someone you know possibly being too thin, I think it’s better to err on the side of concern. Have a talk, one where you say what you think should be said, but listen even more, assuming the topic isn’t outright shut down as it may well be. Eating disorders are fierce. They are destructive but, while a person clings to one, the disorder is also doing something perceived as positive. One person expressing concern may not be enough to affect change. 

 

Tricky stuff. I know it all too well.

   

 



[1] Interestingly, my prior blog post titled BODY TALK and written in 2014 speaks as though I have an eating disorder even though it would still not be diagnosed for three more years. The body and brain knew. Professionals just weren’t picking up on it.

Monday, December 15, 2025

THE NUMBERS GAME


Time to pause for a little celebration. When I started this blog in 2008, it was called Rural Gay. I was feeling isolated as a middle-aged gay man on BC’s Sunshine Coast and the blog was often the only place to explore that part of my identity. In 2015, I moved back to Vancouver and, thus, the blog required a name change, however awkward: Rural Gay Gone Urban. The name never sat well with me and I eventually retitled it to what it is today, Aging Gayly.

 


Throughout this time, I have posted more than 850 posts. I didn’t know I had that much content floating about in my brain! Somehow, I continue to find topics. The aim is to post once a week, but I give myself the week off on occasion when I search my brain and it replies with, “Nope… nothing.” Okay then.

 


This past Saturday, the blog hit a milestone, surpassing 1,000,000 views. Hard to fathom. I am grateful to all who have stopped by, intentionally, curiously or even mistakenly over the years. I will continue to write. I hope you will continue to visit. 

 

  

Monday, December 8, 2025

WHAT DO GAY WRITERS BRING TO GAY ROMANCE?


For the most part, MM romance (male to male, aka, gay romance) is written by women. Some authors skirt their identity by writing under pseudonyms with ambiguously gendered first names (e.g., Chris, Jordan, Pat) or by settling for initials (e.g., H.R. Puffnstuff). For me, the predominance of these pseudonyms speaks to the fact that maybe straight women aren’t the most logical people to be writing about gay romances. 

 

In our present world where who writes about certain identities is rabidly policed, it’s somewhat surprising that little fuss is raised over women writing MM romances. To be honest, I don’t think this issue is on gay men’s radar. Yes, there is a call for gay actors to play gay roles, but there is less focus on who is writing those roles. I still think we’re in the Thirst Era where gay men crave seeing any depiction of gays on the big or small screen. (It’s why I recently sat through the entire series, Bootson Netflix.) 

 

I’m not going to say women can’t write gay characters. Frankly, the policing has edged toward censorship or self-censorship at the very least. I want diversity in my manuscripts because the actual diversity of our world matters more than ever. Yes, that means I want to write about some characters who do not match my gender and identity. (I will likely have to pay for sensitivity readers to ensure I’m properly portraying Black and trans characters and, even then, I will be putting myself out there for sharp criticism should my manuscripts ever be published. (Fingers crossed!))

 

I will say that, when it comes to MM romance, it is refreshing to read a novel when the writer does, in fact, identify as a gay man. I like knowing the writer has gone through a coming out process, pined for the wrong gay men and navigated the gay dating world, apps and all. The hope is that lived experiences make the writing and the characters more relatable.

 

M.A. Wardell’s Teacher of the Year is the second MM romance I’ve read this year by a gay male writer, the other being I’ll Have What He’s Having by Adib Khorram. Both books stand out from other MM romances I’ve read in that they are “spicy” reads. In the romance genre, authors decide how they want to portray sex between the core couple with the range going from “sweet” (hand holding; kissing; any other sexual interplay happening “off the page”) to “spicy” wherein sex happens on the page, private parts and orgasms in full play. (Erotica is a separate genre in which sex is bigger than story.) 

 

I’ll have to read more MM romance by gay men—again, it’s not so common—to see if gay writers have a higher propensity to put the sex on the page. My hypothesis is that they do. Men, in general terms, have been raised (even encouraged?) to go into the details more publicly. (I still cringe over Trump’s “locker room” conversation with Billy Bush.) Sure, women do talk openly about sex but it’s still more of a guy thing, for better or for worse.

 


And here is where I come off as prudish. I could have done with less spice in both Teacher of the Year and I’ll Have What He’s Having. As noted in a prior post, Khorram, takes up twelve pages to describe one sex scene. In Teacher, Wardell is less detailed but he still goes on—the first sex scene is seven pages. Wardell’s spicy scenes are even carefully plotted in terms of playing the bases. First, the main character (MC) gives oral. In the next sex scene, the MC receives oral. This is followed by separate scenes of the MC bottoming and then topping. (I seem to recall the same outline for Khorram’s sex scenes.) In real life, I don’t think acts are always so rigidly separated. It makes the scenes predictable based on an escalating see-saw pattern.

 

My real problem is that I don’t find sex scenes all that interesting. Two or three pages is enough for me to get the gist of what happened. It’s true that sex often takes a relationship to a new level. Any sex in a book (or a movie) is not supposed to be gratuitous—the characters grow separately and as a couple. In my mind, much of the growth comes in the characters talking and/or thinking about the sex after the fact. What just happened? Romance writers tend to mix the thinking in with the sex. This slows down the telling which can make even a spicy scene drag—one that’s, say, seven or twelve pages. I find myself skimming and skipping much of the choreography. It’s supposed to titillate but instead I’m not gaining anything from reading about positioning of hands, tongues and bodies. Call me weird, but I just want to know that sex happened—Yay! They’re more connected!—and get on with the story. 

 

Surely there’s more to gay men writing gay romance than adding details about the sex. Let there be more gay men writing MM romance but let the gay perspective be more evident in terms of how the characters relate and get to know one another out of bed (and, in Teacher of the Year, out of a classroom closet).