Showing posts with label TJ Osborne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TJ Osborne. Show all posts

Thursday, May 19, 2022

I’M OUT or WHY BROADWAY’S REVIVAL OF “TAKE ME OUT” DIDN’T STIR ME


I didn’t do it, I swear. The day after Evan and I saw the revival of “Take Me Out” on Broadway, pictures surfaced on Twitter of the star appearing naked in a particular scene. Our seats were in the balcony, allowing for decent viewing but most definitely not close enough for clear footage of an impressive extra limb, even when flaccid. Smartphone photography remains a work in progress. (Truly, it’s a shame someone opted to create a bit of a frenzy online by posting the clip. As tickets were scanned upon entering the theater, our phones were required to be shut down and placed in locked carrying cases that weren’t opened until after the show. An actor shouldn’t have to worry about his performance being whittled down to a certain appendage, ogled on social media. It’s both undignified and unnecessary. If people really want to see dangling dicks, they can find plenty of free porn on the internet.)

 

Truth is, a man’s naked body on stage isn’t a big deal. “Hair,” premiering on Broadway in 1968 was supposed to shatter that taboo. I suppose it remains uncomfortable or at least a novelty to theater viewers. What appears before them is not contained on a screen. The naked body and the viewer are in the same big room. It makes the cast of “Cats” seem ridiculously overdressed. 

 


It’s not just the star, Jesse Williams, who appears naked. “Take Me Out” is a play about a superstar player coming out as gay and most of the scenes are set in the locker room with players dressing and undressing in front of their lockers or saying their lines in a communal shower which appears and disappears as needed. All the players strip down at one point or another, most more than once. 

 

To be sure, these actors had well-sculpted bodies, easy on the eyes. Still, whenever there is nudity in a play, TV show or movie, my first thought is about whether it’s gratuitous or integral to the telling. Being a reserved person, most of the time I conclude it’s unnecessary. I feel sorry for the actors. I’m (usually) uncomfortable for them. I want the scene to end. Let’s move on to a scene where the main character suffers a career-killing shoulder injury (enough baseball talk, thank you) and tries out for a bit part in “Cats,” fully customed, of course. Keep it authentic. 

 


As a tangent, I’ll add that, while Jesse Williams can certainly be proud of his body, my eyes were fixed on him more in other scenes when he wore form-fitting ath-leisure. Alas, the clothes were not listed in the credits of the Playbill. Guess I’ll forgo an Amazon shopping spree and stick with my frumpy hoodies and saggy jeans.

 

I can make an argument defending the nudity in “Take Me Out.” I won’t go so far as to say it’s necessary, but there was a point to it. First, it might be silly to have guys standing around in full uniforms in every scene. It’s a locker room. I’m writing this at a cafĂ© after having just finished swimming laps. I was in a locker room before and after my swim. There was lots of nakedness. It just happened to be the sort one feels a dire need to turn away from. I don’t need to be inundated with previews of how saggy my ass will look in—what, twenty-five years? Or is it only ten?! Grab your towel, guys, and cover up!

 


I think the nudity was supposed to convey a sense of exposure and vulnerability, the players’ posture and openness to “shoot the shit” changing once it’s revealed that one among them is gay, the straight players implicitly blaming the newly out gay teammate for instilling a sense of modesty and self-consciousness when their modified decorum is really brought on by homophobia. Sure, I can understand that argument. It’s another way to shine a spotlight entrenched man culture. That being said, I’d have preferred it if the play had been set in a dugout and perhaps a bar. I don’t think a single line would have to be amended. Still realistic settings even if it didn’t have players feeling vulnerable in their nakedness with a gay guy in their midst. How much jock-related homophobia do I really need to see?

 

And that leads to the bigger problem I had with “Take Me Out” which originally ran on Broadway in 2003 and won the Tony Award for best play. (It received four new Tony nominations last week, on the same day the nude footage appeared on Twitter, including best play revival and three acting nods, one to Jesse Williams.) Nineteen years ago, the so-called playing field for queer people was considerably more of a minefield. At the beginning of 2003, Netherlands was the only country in the world that had legalized same-sex marriage. “Will and Grace” was a hit TV show, but Sean Hayes, who played Jack, wasn’t out. The U.S. military was still thick in its muted tolerance of gays with its “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy as a means for allowing members to avoid being discharged. In 2003, a baseball team’s unease about a player being openly gay fit with what was going on in society as a whole. Coming out came with complications.

 


As a revival, the discomfort and outright homophobia that players think and feel in “Take Me Out” feels woefully dated, but it’s not presented as a period piece. There aren’t 2003 references in the script. I took it as playing out in 2022. The homophobia in sports—among fans and players—remains largely unchecked. Most gay athletes are still closeted, especially in team sports. It’s a milieu for Neanderthals. It exists, but so much of the rest of North America and Europe has moved on. I’m past the point of seeing portrayals of jocks feeling ogled by a gay teammate and hoping we can learn from it. These jocks are clunky and a play depicting them comes off as just as clunky.

 

Admittedly, there were many in the audience who found the play impactful. People, presumably straight, gasped at expressions of hatred and intolerance, as if they’d not heard these things, as if they thought everyone had moved on. Obviously, not everyone has, but the people I choose to associate with certainly have.

 

Nudity had no part of my wanting to see “Take Me Out.” I simply wanted to see a gay play. I wanted to appreciate the writing. I wanted to identify with gay characters. By intermission, I was wishing we’d chosen a different play; indeed, a different revival. It heartened me when Evan leaned into me and whispered, “Would it be bad if we just left?” My guy was equally apathetic. (I think I would have enjoyed “How I Learned to Drive” with Mary-Louise Parker and David Morse much more. Alas, my trip to New York wasn’t long enough, my pockets not deep enough.)

 

As I’d mentioned last year when country music singer T.J. Osborne of the Brothers Osborne came out as gay and kissed his partner after winning an award on a televised awards show, I was happy for him on a personal level, but I’m so far beyond the point of congratulating sectors that have clung to the Dark Ages when someone finally frees himself from the shackles. A fictional baseball player coming out, naked or not, doesn’t get my attention.

 

  

Monday, November 15, 2021

IS A KISS STILL NEWSWORTHY?


Last week at some country music award show, a member of a brother duo got up and kissed his boyfriend after winning Best Group. The “lite” news sources—the kind that pop up on Yahoo—were all over it. I gullibly clicked, thinking it would be something momentous…on stage or something passionate, with tongue maybe. Nope. A peck. Like Blake Shelton might kiss Gwen Stefani or Keith Urban might kiss Nicole Kidman if either of them had won something.

 

It got me wondering. When will we get to the point where a kiss is just a kiss? Man on man, woman on woman, nonbinary on whoever. 

 

I’m just as guilty as anyone for getting sucked in based on context. Last week’s momentous smack was in the country music milieu, watched by millions of country music fans, people we assume to be more Red State than Blue, more conservative than liberal, more beer drinkin’, pickup drivin’, good ol’ boys than bow-tied chess players who ponder giving up fois gras. 

 

Yep, bro. That dude kissed a dude. Guzzle another Bud, let that sink in.

 

Really, this shouldn’t be news, not even on a news-lite site.

 


According to Wikipedia, the first cinematic man-to-man kiss was almost a century ago, in the movie “Wings” in 1927. (It’s a bit of a miss and the men talk of their “friendship” but, yeah it counts. Watch the clip—the build-up, the eye contact, the hands in each other’s hair...)

 

There was a much-hyped 1989 episode of TV’s “thirtysomething” in which two gay characters were shown in bed together but weren’t allowed to touch. It resulted in boycotts and a significant loss in advertising money for ABC. High stakes. The stakes have been lessening with each subsequent glimpse of togetherness. Laura Dern hugged Ellen, Madonna kissed Britney…and Christina, Katy Perry and Jill Sobule each sang about kissing a girl, hell, by the time Pete Buttigieg started giving his husband, Chasten, little pecks, it barely caused a peep from even the most vile conservative talking pieces who make a living off intentionally boneheaded banter. 

 

There was a time when every teensy bit of public gayness involving a celebrity made headlines and was enthusiastically applauded by all of us under the LGBTQ rainbow. Greg Louganis is gay! Ellen makes the cover of Time! Melissa Etheridge! Sir Ian McKellen! kd lang! Will and Jack are lead characters on a mainstream hit TV show! George Michael! Doogie Howser! Clay Aiken! Adam Lambert! Ricky Martin! Well, golly…Jim Nabors! Jim Parsons…Bazinga! 

 


In North America at least, we’re down to the last bastions. T.J. Osborne from Brothers Osborne isn’t the first country artist to come out as queer, but he’s apparently the first out gay man in country music signed to a major record label, publicly coming out in Time in February this year. (While delving into gay moments in country music, I stumbled upon an online mention of the self-titled “Lavender Country” as being the first gay country album, released in 1973. The track list includes a twangy waltz called “Cryin’ These Cocksucking Tears.” Um…pretty sure they never performed on “Hee Haw” or got an invite to the Grand Ole Opry, but maybe now Kenny Chesney will do a remake.)  

 

Yes, I’m glad T.J. kissed his boyfriend, a gesture that’s so conventional for other award winners. I do think it will offer comfort, maybe inspiration, to closeted queers who listen to country music and wonder if they’ll be accepted should they choose to come out. The bigger news—which didn’t fit into a click-worthy headline—was that The Brothers Osborne sang “Younger Me” at the Country Music Awards, with T.J. prefacing the performance by saying, “I would watch this show year after year and I always thought how incredible it’d be of a dream it’d be of being up on this stage. There were so many things that were so many hurdles for me and I always felt, truthfully felt, like it would never be possible because of my sexuality to be here and I just wish, I wish, my younger me could see me now.” 

 

The lyrics to “Younger Me” are rather bland, watered down as so many pop songs so that a large mass of people can find them relatable. But still, there’s enough there for young queers to latch onto and offer strength:

 

Younger me…

Always dreamed of kicking down the door

What were you waiting for?

 

Younger me

Overthinking, losing sleep at night

Contemplating if it’s worth the fight

 

Younger me

Hanging out but not quite fitting in

Didn’t know that being different

Really wouldn’t be the end.

 

Like I said, bland. But a listener who knows the lyrics are sung by an out gay man will read more into it and see himself in the song. The video also adds more (rainbow) colours.

 


There it is, a breakthrough in country music. About time. (It reminds me of all the press last year for Mickey Guyton’s “Black Like Me” and the prime spot she got performing on this year’s Grammy Awards ceremony.) Congratulations, country music. 

 

The time has passed for public kisses and coming outs in untrod territories to excite me. These moments feel like they’re very late arrivals to the Pride party. We’re still waiting for other breakthroughs on final frontiers. There have been recent ripples in football, soccer and hockey. More work to be done there. Embarrassingly, tennis remains a holdout for a prominent male player to come out. Many women have come out—I still remember the years when commentators stumbled over how to acknowledge Martina Navratilova’s then-partner, Judy Nelson, in the family-and-friends box. I don’t follow golf or wrestling so I don’t know whether there are openly queer competitors. I don’t even have enough interest to Google those fields. What other domains are there?  

 


Yes, it takes someone to step forward and be the first. That’s still courageous, making something personal public. But we’re at a point where it says more about the field than the individual that a kiss or saying, “I’m gay” warrants a headline. Applause? Okay, for the individual. But, with regard to that person’s domain of notoriety, all I can say is, “What took you so long?”